Browse all Reviews
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/tombs_0.jpg?itok=ljW5-zIJ)
The study of war and memory has been popular amongst cultural historians for over two decades, yet scholarly interest in the subject shows no sign of abating. Indeed, as this collection demonstrates, memory remains a fruitful area of research, particularly if approached from a comparative perspective.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/preston.jpg?itok=t2pQ-BgC)
Paul Preston is a renowned historian, and is considered one of the world’s leading experts on 20th-century Spanish history. His book on the genocidal actions taken against Spanish civilians between 1936 and 1945 is an important resource that has changed historiography on the period.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/finneyp.jpg?itok=hWOfrUJ7)
In Remembering the Road to World War Two Patrick Finney (a student of 20th-century international history, history and theory, and collective memory) writes an impressive and informative account, not of the origins of the Second World War, but of the way historians and others have remembered those origins.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/johns.jpg?itok=CfxEJiek)
The writing of history – any history – is shaped by the intellectual environment in which it is written, and by the preoccupations of its writers. As Christopher Tyerman acknowledges in his prefatory remarks, ‘writing history is not a neutral revelation but a malleable, personal, contingent, cultural activity’ (p. xi).
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/eldridge1.jpg?itok=iKS03Hui)
As the title of the first volume under consideration asserts, France is currently in the grip of a divisive and destabilising phenomenon. Guerres de Mémoires, or wars of memories, are currently wracking the land, calling into question national identity and even challenging the hallowed Republican model.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/hornej.jpg?itok=-oj0uW98)
This book can be viewed in several ways. Each of its ten chapters by a different author deals with a discrete topic (women, gender, public opinion, photography and food supply) without any pretence of thematic unity.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/Jackson_France.jpg?itok=YvTBB8mr)
Julian Jackson’s monumental history of Vichy is a powerful contribution to the historiography. No one knows more about this subject than he: every book, article, memoir and dissertation on it seems to have been located, analysed and woven into this account.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/siberry_elizabeth_1.jpg?itok=6i1y4v2c)
How should we read the Crusades? The question begs a host of others, not least how do we read them, in the light of how we have read them in the past. Beginning as a historian of how the Crusades were regarded in their own high mediaeval time, Elizabeth Siberry has more recently constituted herself the historian of how they have since been regarded in our own.