Browse all Reviews
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/chibnallm.jpg?itok=Fs6x2e4p)
In 1992 a conference was held at Reading to study the changing relations between England and Normandy that resulted from the conquest of 1066.(1) Some ten years later, after a period of intense historical investigation, a colloque at Cerisy-la-Salle re-examined the questions raised at Reading and assessed the ways in which historical understanding of t
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/jacobyd.jpg?itok=cfoSI0Wl)
On 13 April 1204 the western or Latin armies participating in the Fourth Crusade conquered Constantinople, the capital of Byzantium. The approaching 800th anniversary of that event has generated renewed interest in the background, context and impact of that crusade, expressed in several new studies and in conferences.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/standenn.jpg?itok=QCXfNt5s)
Students of medieval frontiers spend much of their time explaining how the ambiguous and multiple boundaries they study were very different in many important respects from the normative and singular national borders we live with in the present day. Medieval Frontiers is the third recent collection in English on this subject.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/siberry_elizabeth_1.jpg?itok=6i1y4v2c)
How should we read the Crusades? The question begs a host of others, not least how do we read them, in the light of how we have read them in the past. Beginning as a historian of how the Crusades were regarded in their own high mediaeval time, Elizabeth Siberry has more recently constituted herself the historian of how they have since been regarded in our own.