Browse all Reviews
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/Le_Monde_.png?itok=__pkJejm)
Reports of the death of the Mediterranean – on some accounts from pollution, on others from conceptual redundancy – have proved exaggerated. Conceptually, at least, ‘The Mediterranean’ flourishes as never before: an idea more than a sea. It seems ubiquitous on web sites and in book and journal titles as well as on conference posters, not to mention political action plans.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/hoskingg_0.jpg?itok=FLoaKNWO)
What is a ‘Companion’ for?
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/panayip.jpg?itok=Rdmyp4Eb)
In 1994 I published a now widely cited and highly regarded volume entitled Immigration, Ethnicity and Racism in Britain, 1815–1914 (1), which, at the time, faced critical comment.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/lambes.jpg?itok=Oj9tAQk_)
Glenn Richardson’s latest contribution to early modern Anglo-French relations comes in the form of this edited volume covering nearly three centuries of contact between England and France from 1420 to 1700. The Contending Kingdoms is essentially the proceedings of a Society for Court Studies conference which took place in London in November 2004.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/hessayona.jpg?itok=Uq3wOZ89)
If quincentenaries are anything to go by, then 1492 is now commemorated principally for Christopher Columbus’s transatlantic voyage of exploration rather than either the conclusion of Ferdinand’s and Isabella’s eleven year conquest of Islamic Granada – which completed the Reconquista – or the expulsion of Jews from Castile and Aragon.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/robertsh.jpg?itok=nZu17vt0)
This work of literary criticism is inevitably aimed more at people working in French departments than at social or intellectual historians. Despite the interdisciplinary potential of the subject-matter, there is little here of direct interest to the latter, hence this review is addressed primarily to the former.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/gunngrummit.jpg?itok=nlNhXFSg)
This book is the result of a bold and innovative research project funded between 1999 and 2002 by the then Arts and Humanities Research Board, with further funds provided subsequently by a number of scholarly institutions. The preface further acknowledges the support of a glittering array of scholars, not least Geoffrey Parker who read through the entire draft.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/watts.jpg?itok=S-Vvw5tq)
In the introductory chapter to her engaging book, Ruth Watts remarks on the 'dissonance' between women and science and the seeming paucity of scholarly literature on the subject. Upon deeper investigation, however, Watts soon discovers that she is mistaken.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/najemy.jpg?itok=SRrkl6i2)
John Najemy is a pre-eminent historian of Renaissance Florence.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/Cameron_Christian_History.jpg?itok=hbSz4u6k)
Euan Cameron, former Professor of Early Modern History at the University of Newcastle, now Henry Luce III Professor of Reformation Church History at Union Theological Seminary in New York, has written a fascinating and, in many ways, remarkable study.