Skip to content

Response to Review of The Debate on the Crusades, 1099-2010 (Issues in Historiography)

Modesty forbids any general comment on Simon John’s review other than thanks for his interest and generosity. He is I think absolutely right about the need for further work on medieval crusade texts as works of history and interpretation and not just mines of information. However, that would require a detailed acquaintance with manuscript traditionsContinue reading “Response to Review of The Debate on the Crusades, 1099-2010 (Issues in Historiography)”