Skip to content

Response to Review no. 1091

In our age of soundbites and tweets, an e-journal that can accommodate not only a 9,000-word book review like Professor Duchesne‚Äôs but also a 3,500-word response from the author is a wonderful thing. Historians, after all, are supposed to make progress through the cut-and-thrust of public debate, and it is hard to imagine a betterContinue reading “Response to Review no. 1091”