Skip to content

Response to Review of The Siege and the Fall of Constantinople in 1453. Historiography, Topography, and Military Studies

I must commend Professor Michael Angold for the lengthy review that I deem to be a review article. He has moved from the Komnenian period to the late Palaiologan with the anticipated publication of his monograph on the fall of Constantinople in 1453. There are a number of points in his review that require correctionContinue reading “Response to Review of The Siege and the Fall of Constantinople in 1453. Historiography, Topography, and Military Studies”