Skip to content

Response to Review of A Social History of Knowledge. Volume II: From the Encyclop├ędie to Wikipedia

I don’t normally respond to reviews, even negative ones, but on this occasion Dr Davies’s review of my recent book reveals some misunderstandings that may be worth clearing up. In the first place, I am supposed to have ‘endorsed’ certain trends in the history of knowledge and even to have ‘legitimized’ the employment of knowledgeContinue reading “Response to Review of A Social History of Knowledge. Volume II: From the Encyclop├ędie to Wikipedia”