Search
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/elmer_0.jpg?itok=fW63z9Hx)
In his latest book, Dr Peter Elmer grapples with two of the thorniest, and most enduring, questions in the study of witchcraft and witch-hunting: How might we account for fluctuations in the number of witch-craft prosecutions? And what explains the eventual demise of witchcraft prosecutions (in England, at least) by the end of the 17th century?
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/doran.jpg?itok=r24zQCIn)
Susan Doran is an established, well-respected Elizabethan historian, and her most recent book confirms that she can successfully analyze Elizabeth in ways accessible and interesting to both an academic audience and a popular one.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/shoemaker.jpg?itok=3aaFMm0N)
At the start of this century, Tim Hitchcock and Bob Shoemaker undertook the digitisation of the surviving editions of the Old Bailey Proceedings, with the object to create a searchable resource in a form accessible to the public and free at the point of use. Last year, 2015, was the anniversary of the launch of the first database in 2005.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/shaw.jpg?itok=o5A0HRle)
Over the past year more than 600,000 people have crossed the Mediterranean and Southeast Europe to seek asylum in the European Union.(1) While countries such as Germany have been incredibly welcoming in offering these refugees protection (with an increase of 155 per cent from 2014–15), others – most notably the United Kingdom – have been reluctant to open their border
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/dale.jpg?itok=95U9AwhE)
A popular exhibition at the Wellcome Trust in London, running for three months from October 2016, Bedlam: the Asylum and Beyond promised to ‘reimagine the institution, informed by the experiences of the patients, doctors, artists and reformers who inhabited the asylum or created alternatives to it’.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/gottlieb_0.jpg?itok=xswzHkIg)
For more than 75 years the historiographical debate surrounding the appeasement policy of the 1930s has centred upon the notorious 1940 publication Guilty Men, in which a trio of left-leaning British journalists unleashed a vitriolic polemic castigating those men responsible for leading a hopelessly ill-prepared Britain into a catastrophic war.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/toczek.jpg?itok=VEjzE0Lm)
It has become a cliché to begin articles, reviews or books covering research into Britain’s far-right by explaining how the field has blossomed over recent years. Studies of the inter-war period in particular have developed over the last few decades, from a few books and articles into a large and – for those who are new to the subject – overwhelming discipline.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/hatherley.jpg?itok=OWdjW_Hy)
Owen Hatherley’s latest book is a compelling exploration of one way in which the British political establishment and the British public (mis)interpret, (mis)remember, and (fail to) engage with history. The history with which Hatherley is concerned is the Attlee government of 1945–51, set within the wider era described mostly, vaguely, as ‘post-war’.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/crookbig.jpg?itok=98tQRbq8)
Tom Crook has written a big book – big in scope, range, and thought. It is both an overview of the institutionalization of public health in England and an interpretation of that event as paradigmatic of the systems and practices of pervasive governance that constitute modernity.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/sonnelitter.png?itok=P4QQebFy)
In the conclusion to this ambitious, and timely, attempt to develop an integrated interpretation of the charitable and improving agenda that was a defining feature of 18th-century Irish society, Karen Sonnelitter observes that the 18th century witnessed a shift from ‘a close traditional philanthropy motivated solely by social or religious obligation … towards rational and constructive charity’