Search
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/wlliams.jpg?itok=ARI0czpA)
This is an accessible and engaging book about the ranks, obligations, and image of the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy, written by one of the leading historians of the period. Ann Williams is the author of The English and the Norman Conquest, Kingship and Government in Pre-Conquest England c.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/naismithr.jpg?itok=pyM_SQNW)
Æthelstan might not, to the uninitiated, seem a very likely candidate for a volume in the prestigious Yale English Monarchs series. He lacks the name-recognition associated with a Conquerer or a Confessor, and is not the subject of any compelling anecdotes about beaches or cakes which have wormed their way into the popular consciousness.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/pase.jpg?itok=yG5owoHb)
Anglo-Saxon historians are in an enviable position when it comes to electronic resources.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/molyneaux.jpg?itok=QejT3FBb)
In The Formation of the English Kingdom in the Tenth Century, George Molyneaux investigates how territories under the dominion of the Cerdicing kings of Wessex developed into a clearly defined and conquerable kingdom. The book’s fundamental argument is that the period 871 through 1066 cannot be treated as a cohesive block of history.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/lavelle.jpg?itok=5AV4btu2)
The 13 essays in this book are the outcome of a conference (with the addition of a few other papers) held at Winchester University in September 2011.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/lambert_1.jpg?itok=IR2oHtdf)
It is the title which gives away a great deal about this very fine book, and should alert us to Tom Lambert’s ambition for this project, which has grown out of a University of Durham PhD thesis. ‘Law’ positions it as a work of legal history, but it is the component of ‘order’ which offers the second and bolder half of Lambert’s argument.