Search
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/copenhaver.jpg?itok=wOn3cPF8)
Frances Yates’ seminal book Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (1964), which established a longstanding scholarly orthodoxy that Renaissance magic derived from interpretations of the Hermetic Corpus, has been challenged in its details by Bruno scholars and others.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/51nWsaNI6NL.jpg?itok=EOEUHNal)
This is an extremely ambitious, thought-provoking, challenging and inspiring book.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/bloxham1.jpg?itok=lnKzzO-d)
The sub-branch of history that is known by the ambiguous (and frightening to undergraduates, cats, and many mainstream academics) name “historiography” seems to be undergoing a Renaissance at the moment.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/AI.jpg?itok=sWUAgb3V)
‘Artificial intelligence (AI)’ is a loaded term, rife with connotative contradiction that inspires debate, disagreement, and disillusion. But what is AI, really? How have our expectations of computational capability, and even a robot Armageddon, come to be? Why does it matter how we talk about increasingly sophisticated technology, not just in expository prose, but also in fiction?