Search
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/knoppersl.jpg?itok=w1dBeWbN)
‘Do you recollect the date’, said Mr. Dick, looking earnestly at me, and taking up his pen to note it down, ‘when King Charles the First had his head cut off’?(1)
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/George_III.jpg?itok=9ETMTBcP)
Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO) is an immensely ambitious undertaking: over 150,000 texts in an online searchable database.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/luckhurstr.jpg?itok=sVJufn_a)
Trauma has become a burning topic in Western cultures of late. Traumatic events and debates over how they are remembered by individuals and memorialised by cultures are important for lots of different constituencies.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/hornej.jpg?itok=-oj0uW98)
This book can be viewed in several ways. Each of its ten chapters by a different author deals with a discrete topic (women, gender, public opinion, photography and food supply) without any pretence of thematic unity.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/beerd_0.jpg?itok=giSst5HJ)
'It is not necessary to be dull to write about history', Ged Martin remarks (p. 8). One suspects that many historians would add, 'but it helps'. This book is a wonderful antidote to that excessive seriousness. The style is crisp, paradox and aphorism abound – 'historians love paradoxes', Martin says (p.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/Belman_Culture.jpg?itok=FI1cOKo3)
The use of the past in previous eras has become a growth area of historical enquiry in recent times, exemplified by the enormous Cambridge University project, ‘Past Versus Present: Abandoning the Past in an Age of Progress’, on the Victorians’ relationship to the past.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/beck.jpg?itok=25gole29)
To historians, the intrinsic value of history is self-evident. However, the study of history as an intellectual activity extends beyond the careful reconstruction and critical analysis of the past. For the past seeps into the present: it shapes the identities, perceptions, and attitudes of individuals and institutions.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/daviesm.jpg?itok=n0BVol9y)
‘We are most of us governed by epistemologies that we know to be wrong’: Gregory Bateson’s observation summarizes what motivates Keith Jenkins’s latest book.(1) In this collection of essays written and published over the last 15 years (including not only a foreword by Hayden White and an afterword by Alun Munslow, but also responses from Perez Zagorin and Michael C.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/Huttons_Sun.jpg?itok=h8Lw3X3r)
We have never been less interested in the details of history than we are today, and we have never been more committed to a weak and often reductive view of a romanticized past.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/Carr_What_Is_History.jpeg?itok=lX8l_SEb)
Edward Hallett Carr's contribution to the study of Soviet history is widely regarded as highly distinguished. In all probability very few would argue against this assessment of his multi-volume history of Soviet Russia. For the majority of historians he pretty much got the story straight.