Search
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/brogan.jpg?itok=0VYKT0zu)
With The Royal Touch in Early Modern England: Politics, Medicine and Sin, Stephen Brogan offers a new understanding of the royal touch – the ability of kings and queens to miraculously heal their subjects of particular diseases in 16th and especially 17th-century England.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/sneddon.jpg?itok=AjpOWv-w)
The first rigorous academic overview of witchcraft in Ireland, this publication is a very welcome addition to a growing corpus of scholarship on this relatively neglected aspect of Irish social and cultural history. For decades, St John D. Seymour’s Irish Witchcraft and Demonology (1) was the only academic text on the subject available to researchers.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/elmer_0.jpg?itok=fW63z9Hx)
In his latest book, Dr Peter Elmer grapples with two of the thorniest, and most enduring, questions in the study of witchcraft and witch-hunting: How might we account for fluctuations in the number of witch-craft prosecutions? And what explains the eventual demise of witchcraft prosecutions (in England, at least) by the end of the 17th century?
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/kidd.jpg?itok=H-4sJ41Y)
American evangelicalism has, for some time, been dominated by Baptists. American Baptist churches attract tens of millions of worshippers, and the Southern Baptist Convention stands unrivalled as the single largest Protestant denomination in the country. And yet, despite their numerical hegemony, American Baptists have not attracted commensurate attention from historians.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/palaver.jpg?itok=2kgwwyql)
The history of the European Wars of Religion from the Crusades onward has provided fertile ground for study by historians, philosophers, and theologians of all ideological persuasions. The period from the 1520s forward particularly has served as the subject of an astonishing amount of research – with no discernable chronological gap in the historiography.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/51awBqK5lqL_0.png?itok=Q0LjQgC_)
Thomas Ahnert’s The Moral Culture of the Scottish Enlightenment is an unusual work. Little more than an extended essay, its brevity and lucidity belie the complexity and force of its central thesis. Whilst there is no doubt that the book represents an important historiographical intervention, it is rather harder to explain why or where it does so.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/erdozain.jpg?itok=pwczl4n7)
Dominic Erdozain is a scholar with a mission: to convince sceptics that religious doubt arises from faith, and more specifically from the religious conscience. It is when faith does not live up to what it promises, argues Erdozain, causing conflict and injustice, that it leads to doubt.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/51xEKUuSP2L._SX333_BO1204203200_.png?itok=lJs0gdnD)
Exile has long been central to our understanding of certain Early Modern topics. The flight of English Protestants, and then Catholics, to the Continent in the 16th century, or the exodus of Huguenots (many to England and Ireland) after the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes in the 17th, are perhaps the best known examples to UK audiences.
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/israel_0.jpg?itok=9wpFs2dz)
Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750 (Oxford, 2001); Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752 (Oxford, 2006); Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution and Human Rights 1750–1790 (Oxford, 2011); Revolutionary Ideas: an Intellectual History of the French Revolution from the Rights
![](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/sites/reviews/files/styles/thumbnail/public/images/copenhaver.jpg?itok=wOn3cPF8)
Frances Yates’ seminal book Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (1964), which established a longstanding scholarly orthodoxy that Renaissance magic derived from interpretations of the Hermetic Corpus, has been challenged in its details by Bruno scholars and others.